El Justicia de Aragón ha comunicado a esta Asociación la suspensión de la tramitación de la queja formulada en relación con el Decreto 118/2009, de 7 de julio, del Gobierno de Aragón, por el que se reguló la “promoción interna temporal” de los funcionarios de la Administración de la Comunidad Autónoma, a través de la figura de la “comisión de servicios en distinta escala o clase de especialidad”.
Esta Asociación pidió la intervención del Justicia de Aragón, al entender que dicho Decreto vulneraba el contenido de la Ley de Ordenación de la Función Pública de la Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón, norma que integra el ordenamiento jurídico aragonés, cuya tutela es una misión que el Estatuto de Autonomía de Aragón encomienda al Justicia de Aragón.
No obstante, al haberse impugnado dicho Decreto en vía jurisdiccional, el Justicia de Aragón ha acordado, conforme a lo previsto en la Ley que regula dicha Institución, suspender la tramitación de la queja, comunicándolo así a esta Asociación.
Se reproduce, a continuación, el texto íntegro de la comunicación del Justicia de Aragón a esta Asociación:
“Expte. DI-113/2008-4.
D. Julio Guiral Pelegrín
Asociación para la Defensa de la Función
Pública Aragonesa.
18 de Noviembre de 2009.
Estimado señor:
De nuevo me pongo en contacto con Ud. en relación con la queja que presentó ante esta Institución y que quedó registrada con el número de referencia arriba expresado, ya que hemos tenido conocimiento de que por los mismos hechos que motivaron la queja, se sigue procedimiento judicial ante la jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa.
La Ley que regula el funcionamiento de esta Institución, establece en su artículo 15.2 que “El Justicia no entrará en el examen de aquellas quejas sobre las que esté pendiente resolución judicial y lo suspenderá si iniciada su tramitación se interpusiese o formulase por persona interesada demanda, denuncia, querella o recurso ante los Tribunales ordinarios o el Tribunal Constitucional”.
Visto lo expuesto, me veo en la obligación de suspender mi intervención y proceder al archivo de la queja presentada por Ud. ante esta Institución. No obstante, le agradeceré que en su momento nos haga saber el resultado del procedimiento judicial a efectos de poder completar el expediente y por si procediera la reapertura del mismo en relación con alguna cuestión que no hubiere sido afectada por dicha resolución.
Aprovecho la ocasión para agradecerle, una vez más, la confianza depositada en esta Institución.
Atentamente.
EL JUSTICIA DE ARAGÓN, FERNANDO GARCÍA VICENTE”.
Like the battle of Waterloo, the battle for Scotland was a damn close-run thing. The effects of Thursday’s no vote are enormous – though not as massive as the consequences of a yes would have been.
The vote against independence means, above all, that the 307-year Union survives. It therefore means that the UK remains a G7 economic power and a member of the UN security council. It means Scotland will get more devolution. It means David Cameron will not be forced out. It means any Ed Miliband-led government elected next May has the chance to serve a full term, not find itself without a majority in 2016, when the Scots would have left. It means the pollsters got it right, Madrid will sleep a little more easily, and it means the banks will open on Friday morning as usual.
But the battlefield is still full of resonant lessons. The win, though close, was decisive. It looks like a 54%-46% or thereabouts. That’s not as good as it looked like being a couple of months ago. But it’s a lot more decisive than the recent polls had hinted. Second, it was women who saved the union. In the polls, men were decisively in favour of yes. The yes campaign was in some sense a guy thing. Men wanted to make a break with the Scotland they inhabit. Women didn’t. Third, this was to a significant degree a class vote too. Richer Scotland stuck with the union — so no did very well in a lot of traditonal SNP areas. Poorer Scotland, Labour Scotland, slipped towards yes, handing Glasgow, Dundee and North Lanarkshire to the independence camp. Gordon Brown stopped the slippage from becoming a rout, perhaps, but the questions for Labour — and for left politics more broadly — are profound.
For Scots, the no vote means relief for some, despair for others, both on the grand scale. For those who dreamed that a yes vote would take Scots on a journey to a land of milk, oil and honey, the mood this morning will be grim. Something that thousands of Scots wanted to be wonderful or merely just to witness has disappeared. The anticlimax will be cruel and crushing. For others, the majority, there will be thankfulness above all but uneasiness too. Thursday’s vote exposed a Scotland divided down the middle and against itself. Healing that hurt will not be easy or quick. It’s time to put away all flags.
The immediate political question now suddenly moves to London. Gordon Brown promised last week that work will start on Friday on drawing up the terms of a new devolution settlement. That may be a promise too far after the red-eyed adrenalin-pumping exhaustion of the past few days. But the deal needs to be on the table by the end of next month. It will not be easy to reconcile all the interests – Scots, English, Welsh, Northern Irish and local. But it is an epochal opportunity. The plan, like the banks, is too big to fail.
Alex Salmond and the SNP are not going anywhere. They will still govern Scotland until 2016. There will be speculation about Salmond’s position, and the SNP will need to decide whether to run in 2016 on a second referendum pledge. More immediately, the SNP will have to decide whether to go all-out win to more Westminster seats in the 2015 general election, in order to hold the next government’s feet to the fire over the promised devo-max settlement. Independence campaigners will feel gutted this morning. But they came within a whisker of ending the United Kingdom on Thursday. One day, perhaps soon, they will surely be back.
(Artículo de Martin Kettle, publicado en "The Guardian" el 19 de septiembre de 2014)
1 comentario:
Ningún esfuerzo es baldío.
Publicar un comentario